|
|
||
Vol. 7 2 / 2002
|
Soá baùo Xuaân
ñaëc bieät |
|
|
||
Response to the
readings
Virginia Towne
Divide and
separate. ("Teaching the Differences Among Women
from a Historical Perspective") In all this talk about women being
different from each other I notice the middle class white woman (who seems to
be pretty upper class to me) as being the base woman to whom everyone else
seems to be compared. No one has
mentioned the poor white woman in the south before the civil war, and the Irish
domestic in
I really believe
that a lot this talk of race used in various ways is another way of describing
class. Race is handy if you wish to
subjugate an entire group of people who are identifiably different from you in
the society the subjugation is taking place.
However, once you have subjugated them they are of a lower class than
people who look like you, and the subjugation of the lower class can be
enforced. If we perceive that someone is
not as good as we, we look down on them.
If we perceive that everyone looks down on us for something, we feel
inferior. In a more modern idiom, say to
yourselves "homeless" and "welfare mother" and see what
images pop into your mind. When you say
these words do you see a woman escaping an abusive husband, going to college
with a 3.9 average and working up to three part time jobs? My experience is that most people see drug
addicted dirty people, perhaps of a different race than the one they belong to.
We as a society
are working on all sorts of problems: seeing ourselves as no better or worse
than anyone else and allowing people to work to their potential and not some
preconceived notion based on gender, race or class. Major problems may be continuing due to over
analysis of the differences between us; where do we end in the
subdivisions. Each person is different
from every other person and has a different perspective based on their own
past, their cultural past, and their own uniqueness.
Perhaps the real
problem is that we still are not recording the experience of the
"secondary" people in our society.
The horrible disaster in
When the history
of this incident is read in fifty years, will anyone see women of all classes
and ethnic identity as anything besides victims and secondary to the
"real" story?
In the past where
sources as to the history of subjugated people did exist, they have been
discounted. The verbal histories passed
down for generations are only accepted if they fit into the conqueror's
ideology. Women's books and other
writings simply were not important enough to save. This has held true over at
least the last two centuries.